Majority
Headnote
Highways—Barrier.The defendant has sought to be made responsible in this action for damages sustained by plaintiff in consequence •of alleged negligence of its highway commissioners in omitting to place barriers on the side of a highway in said town, in consequence of which plaintiff received the injuries cpmplained of. We think the trial judge did not err in granting the motion for a nonsuit. .Even if he was mistaken in holding that the case, as far as the evidence of the plaintiff was concerned, was substantially ■as it was on the former trial, and hence that it could not be submitted to the jury under doctrines laid down in this case by the ■court of appeals ( 131 N. Y. 447 ; 43 St. Rep. 319 ), yet under the law as established in the subsequent case of Lane v. Town of Hancock, 142 N. Y. 510 ; 60 St. Rep. 112 , the trial court was compelled to dismiss the complaint.
The negligence charged against the defendant’s highway commissioners was in not erecting barriers on the side of the highway .at the place where the accident occurred, and where there was a perpendicular descent to the water of the pond below. In Lane v. Town of Hancock, supra, the evidence tending to show negligence on the part of the highway commissioners of the town of Hancock was stronger than in this case. In that case the road was built along the side of a steep hill, with a retaining wall on the lower side, and was but 12 to 15 feet wide, sloping from the upper to the lower side 18 inches. Water flowing over the
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
All concur.
Cases cited
- Glasier v. Town of Hebron 131 N. Y. 447 p. 554
- Lane v. Town of Hancock 142 N. Y. 510 p. 554