Health Department v. Rector of Trinity Church

This is an application to the general term (January, 1895) to amend a prior order of the general term (March 7,1892). An order having been made by the general term in March, 1892, permitting an appeal from its decision to the court of appeals (the .action having been commenced in a district court), it is now asked that the general term amend such order by inserting therein the ground upon which it was made, viz. that a question of law is involved, which ought to be reviewed by the court of appeals. Such a statement in the order, where the amount of the matter in controversy, as in this case, does not exceed $500, is required, in order to authorize an appeal to the court of appeals. Laws 1874, c. 322; Squire v. McDonald, 138 N. Y. 554 ; 53 St. Rep. 269 ; B astable v. City of Syracuse, 72 N. Y. 64 . The application for the amendment, is opposed on the ground that we have no jurisdiction to make the amendment, and De Freest v. City of Troy, 34 Hun, 580 ; Van Horne v. Campbell, 101 N. Y. 608 ,—are cited as authority. The last-named case holds that the power to allow an appeal to the court of appeals can only be exercised by the general term which rendered the decision, or by the next general term held after judgment thereon has been entered. The case has no bearing upon the question of amending an order whereby permission to appeal to the court of appeals was heretofore and seasonably granted. The -court possesses unrestricted power, at all times, to make the record declare the truth as to its judgment. National City Bank v. New York Cold Exch. Bank, 97 N. Y. 645 . In that case it was held

All concur.