← Cases

Ritchie v. Seaboard National Bank

66 N.Y. St. Rep. 357 Court N.Y.C.P. Decision date 1895-04-01 English

Delivered by *358 Bischoff, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 357
Albert Ritchie, as Receiver, etc., App’lt, v. Seaboard National Bank, Resp’t.
(New York Common Pleas, General Term,
Filed April 1, 1895.)

Headnote

Trial—Preferred cause.
A cause cannot tie preferred, under § 793 of the Code, where no notice of trial has been served.
Appeal from so much of an order as denied the motion for a preference of the cause.
William D. Tyndall, for app’lt; Herman Asron, for resp’t.

The determination below that the plaintiff's motion for a preference should be denied is clearly to be supported. In order that the right to a preference under section 791 of the Code of Civil Procedure may be preserved and successfully invoked, it is essential that the party desiring the preference " serve upon the opposite party, with his notice of trial, a notice that an application will be made to the court at the opening thereof, tor leave to move the same as a preferred cause.” Code Civ. Proc. § 793. In the present case, no notice of trial having ever been served, it results that the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the' statutory requirements deprived him of the benefit sought to be availed of. Fox v. Quinn, 12 Supp. 725.

Order affirmed, with costs.