Majority
Headnote
Corporation — Directors—Valué oe stock.— The defendant company having suffered a loss of $150,000, the board of directors charged this loss, pro rata, against the stock of the company’s shareholders, in establishing the book value of shares, and the single question submitted for decision is whether the board had authority for the act. Unquestionably, a board of directors has no power to reduce the capital stock of a corporation, as fixed by its constitution. Railroad Co., v. Schuyler, 34 N. Y. 30 ; Sutherland v. Olcott, 95 id. 93 ; Railway Co., v. Allerton, 18 Wall. 233 , 234. If the defendant may be said to have a capital stock, its amount is not ascertained, nor is it reduced otherwise than to meet losses sustained by the company in the prosecution of its business. The board of directors has the management of the common concerns of the company (article 4 of the constitution). Tayl. Oorp. §§ 180, 683. And we are of the opinion that to charge the losses of the cotiy pony against its stock was an ordinary incident of its administration. People v. Lowe, 117 N. Y. 175 ; 27 St. Rep. 138 . By article 8 of defendant’s constitution, the book value of a share of
The order is affirmed, with costs.
Cases cited
- New York & New Haven Railroad v. Schuyler 34 N. Y. 30 p. 115
- Railway Co. v. Allerton 18 Wall. 233 at 234 p. 115
- People v. Lowe 117 N. Y. 175 p. 115