Hyperlawhypertext legal database People ex rel. Winfield v. Bruning 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 20

← Cases

People ex rel. Winfield v. Bruning

69 N.Y. St. Rep. 20 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1895-07-26 English

Delivered by Dykman, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 20
The People ex rel. Richard M. Winfield, App’lt, v. Charles F. Bruning et al., as Common Council, etc., Resp’ts.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,
Filed July 26, 1895.)

Headnote

Statutes—Previous acts.
Chap. 182 of 1892, though referring to previous acts without incorporating them therein, was held not to violate section 17, art. 3 of the state constitution, which provides that no act shall become part of another law except by inserting it therein.
Certiorari to review an assessment, made by the common council of the village of Mount Vernon.
Milo J. White, for relator ; David Swits, foP resp’ts.

This is a certiorari to review an assessment laid against the property of the relator for the construction of a sewer in the city of Mount Vernon, in Westchester county. That city was incorporated in March, 1892, by an act of the legislature, and the sewer in question was constructed under the provisions of that act, and section 181 of the act provides for a plan and system of sewers for the portion of the city not already sewered, and the construction of sewers in accordance with such plan and system. The city was the successor of the village of Mount Vernon, and some sewers had been constructed in the village before it was merged into a city. After providing for the preparation of a plan as already stated, section 181 contains this language:

“All general laws and special acts in relation to sewers applicable at the time of the passage of this act, to the village of Mount Vernon, shall apply with equal force to the city of Mount Vernon, to all sewer hereafter to be constructed therein, and any sewerage loan bonds which may be issued by said city under chapter 608 of the Laws of 1886 and the several amendments thereto shall be designated 1 Sewerage Loan Bonds of the City of Mount Vernon.’ ”

This last part of the section is- now challenged as being violative of section 17 of article 3 of the constitution of the state of New York, which is this:

“No act shall be passed which shall provide that any existing law, or any part thereof, shall be made or deemed a part of said ■act, or which shall enact that any existing law, or any part thereof, shall be deemed applicable, except by inserting it in said act.”
p. 21
That provision of the constitution is designed to prevent hasty and inconsiderate legislation of which legislators might be ignorant. It was not designed to interdict the subordination of spepial acts to some provisions of general statutes regulating the procedure under the act. The rule upon the subject is this :
“ Where a statute, by its own language, grants some power, confers some right, imposes some duty, or creates some obligation, the fact that it refers to some other existing statute, general or local, in order to point out'the procedure, or some administrative detail necessary for the accomplishment of the purposes of the act, does not bring it in conflict with the provision of the constitution under consideration. People ex rel. Everson v. Lorillard, 135 N. Y. 285 ; 47 St. Rep. 823 .

The statute under review in that case was much nearer the danger line than this, and it was held there that an act providing for the acquisition and improvement of certain land in connection with Washington bridge was not rendered obnoxious to the constitutional provision now invoiced because of the fact that it referred to another local act as to method of procedute to be had to acquire title to the lands required. The portion of the statute under consideration does not re-enact the statutes to which it refers. It simply provides that all the statutes relating to sewers which were applicable to the village of Mount Vernon shall apply to all the sewers thereafter to be constructed in the city of Mount Vernon. It is to be observed further that section 181 of the city charter contained ample provisions for the construction of sewers indenendent of the clause which referred to other statutes. As all the proceedings for the levying of the assessment were regular and legal, they must be confirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Cases cited