← Cases

Kettle v. Turl

70 N.Y. St. Rep. 698 Court N.Y.C.P. Decision date 1895-12-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 698
James Kettle, App’lt, v. John Turl et al., Resp’t.
(New York Common Pleas, General Term,
Filed December 2, 1895.)

Headnote

Appeal—Resettlement oe case.
After argument and decision of an appeal, it is too late for the defeated party to apply for a resettlement of the case.'
Motion for a new trial on exceptions, ordered to be heard at general term in the first instance.
George H. Hart (John H. Whiting, of counsel), for pl’ff; Niles & Johnson (William W. Niles, of counsel), for def’ts.

Motion for resettlement of case. After argument and decision of an appeal it is too late for the defeated party to apply for a resettlement of the case in order to obtain a different statement of facts upon the record by the insertion of questions and answers which he deemed immaterial in making up his case, and which for the first time appear material to him after an adverse decision. It might be different if the proposed amendment were in support of a judgment, and where matter was improperly inserted or omitted by the other party to the controversy.

Motion denied, with $10 costs.