Majority
Headnote
1. Attachment—Vacation.In order that the moving party can succeed in a motion of this description, it is necessary for him to show that he has a valid levy upon the property upon which the attachment sought to be set aside has been levied. In the case at bar it appears that the attachment of the moving party was issued on the 17th of December, 1895, and that the affidavit upon which the appellant moved to set aside the respondents’ attachment was made on the 5th of February, 1896. More than thirty days had elapsed between the granting of the appellant’s attachment and the making of the affidavit, and such affidavit fails to show that at the time it was made the service of the summons was made personally upon the defendant, or service by publication begun. In order that the lien of an attachment shall continue, it is necessary, under section 638 of the Code, that within thirty days after the granting of such attachment the summons shall be either personally served upon the defendant, or service by publication begun. The provision of the section in question is that a warrant may be granted by a judge of the court, or by any county judge, to accompany the summons, or at any time after the commencement of the action, before final judgment. Personal service of the summons must be made upon the defendant against ■whose property the warrant is granted within thirty days after the granting thereof, or else, before the expiration of the same time, service of the summons by publication must be commenced, or
The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.