tain stocks and other secuities, between the 28th day of August, 1895, and the 9th day of November, 1895, to the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars. That said action is about to be commenced by the service of the summons and complaint therein, and a copy of the summons therein is hereto annexed. That it is necessary for your petitioner, in order to enable her to frame her complaint, to obtain a discovery or inspection of certain books, to wit, the order book and journal of the defendants, which said books relate to the merits of said action, and are in the control and possession of the said defendants; and your petitioner has no means whatsoever of obtaining the said facts and information, save from an inspection of said books. That the information sought to bo obtained from the discovery and inspection of said books is as follows: Of whom the defendants bought certain stocks, securities, and other values, for account of your petitioner, between the 28th day of August, 1895, and the 9th day of November, 1895, and to whom they sold certain stocks, securities, and other values, for account of your petitioner, between the 28th day of August, 1895, and the 9th day of November, 1895; and that said books contain such information. That your petitioner has demanded of the defendants the said facts and information, and leave to inspect said books; but said defendants have utterly failed, refused, and neglected to give to your petitioner said facte and information, or to give your petitioner leave to make such inspection. Wherefore your petitioner prays that this court may grant an order that the said defendants to give your petitioner an said books, or require said defendants to give your petitioner an inspection and copy of said books, so far as they contain the transactions between your petitioner and said defendants, or permission to take a copy thereof. And your petitioner will ever pray.
Dated New Tork, March 10th, 1896.
H. W. Simpson, for app’lts; William J. Lippmann, for resp’t.
This order must be reversed. There was absolutely nothing shown to entitle the plaintiff to an inspection oí books and papers in order that she might prepare her complaint, but, on the contrary, the very petition which she presented to the court shows that she was in possession of every fact or circum.stance that would be necessary for her to know in order that a formal complaint might be prepared. She states that the defendants misappropriated her moneys between the 28th of August, 1895, and the 9th day of November, 1895, and that she left with' them during that period the sum of $25,000. Those are the only facts necessary to set up in a complaint. The allegation in her petition that it is necessary for her to know of whom the defendants bought stocks or securities for account of the plaintiff be