← Cases

Hallock v. Randall

10 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616 Court N.Y. Sup. Ct. English

Contents

Majority

p. 616
WILLIAM H. HALLOCK and another, Appellants, v. J. ORLANDO RANDALL, Respondent.

Headnote

Gross-examination —power of judge at circuit to limit.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the deféndant, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The only question presented by the appeal, related to the exclusion of a question; asked upon the cross-examination of. a witness. The General Term held, that “ The question referred to, is one of
p. 617
that class which it is not error to admit or reject; there was so much testimony in the case, from different witnesses, that the judge at circuit might exercise the power in his judicial discretion, of limiting all examinations and cross-examinations within reasonable bounds.”
Miller da Tuthill, for the appellants.
Strong da Spear, for the respondent.

Opinion by Tapper, J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Tapper and Donohue, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.