Hyperlawhypertext legal database Platt v. Parker 11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 135

← Cases

Platt v. Parker

11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 135 Court N.Y. Sup. Ct. English

Delivered by Tappen, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 135
GEORGE W. PLATT, Appellant, v. WILLIAM A. PARKER and THEODORE F. PIER, Respondents.

Headnote

Bankruptcy—omission of name of creditor in debtor's schedule — effect of—fraud must be shown.
The omission from the schedule of the debtor, of the name or claim of a creditor, does not invalidate the discharge of the debtor in bankruptcy, unless it be • shown to have been omitted fraudulently.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, entered on the report of a referee, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint.
p. 136
Edward S. Clinch, for the appellant.
Wm. A. Jenner, for the respondents.

Opinion by

Present— Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Tapper, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.