← Cases

Nicholson v. Waful

13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 655 Court N.Y. Gen. Term English

Judges Present' — Mullin, P. J"., Smith and Gilbert, JJ.

Delivered by Mullin, P. J.

Contents

Majority

p. 655
SAMUEL L. NICHOLSON, Respondent, v. HEMAN WAFUL, Appellant.

Headnote

Evidence.
In this action, brought against the defendant as the maker of a promissory note for $450, dated April 28th, 1878, he denied that he had ever made such a note, and alleged that, if he had ever signed the note, it was while he was intoxicated, and that he only received $250, for which amount he had given his note. Upon the stand he offered to show that in 1870 the plaintiff said he had not $100 ; that for some two years he was employed by a firm of millers, and
p. 656
received one dollar and fifty cents per day, out of which he had to support a wife and furnish a house; that in June or July, 1872, he said he had no funds, and could not raise $100; which evidence was, against the exception of defendant’s counsel, rejected. Held, error ; that it should have heen admitted, as tending to show that the defendant had never received the money.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.
K. Whiting, for appellant. Lansing dc Rogers, for respondent.

Opinion by

Present' — Mullin, P. J"., Smith and Gilbert, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted before another referee, with costs to abide the event.