Cronin v. Stoddard

33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 245 Court N.Y. Gen. Term English

Contents

Majority

p. 245

David Cronin, as Overseer, etc., Respondent, v. Willard F. Stoddard, Appellant .

Judgment affirmed. Held, that the three rules were sufficiently proved, without the testimony of Luce. The commitment was immaterial and was properly excluded; the other questions in the case are controlled by Cronin v. Gandy ( 16 Hun, 520 ).