Hyperlawhypertext legal database Utica City National Bank v. Doring 36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612

← Cases

Utica City National Bank v. Doring

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612 Court N.Y. Gen. Term English

Contents

Majority

p. 612
Utica City National Bank and others, Respondents, v. Catherine M. Doring and others, Appellants.

— So much of the judgment appealed from as declares void and sets aside the four judgments in favor of the defendant Sylvester Doring, as committee,

p. 613
etc., is reversed and a new trial ordered as to tlie issues respecting said judgments, with costs to abide event, and the residue of the judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs as against the’ defendants other than the said committee. Opinion by Barker, J.; dissenting opinion by Hardin, J.