Hyperlawhypertext legal database Vail v. Kensett 36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 672

← Cases

Vail v. Kensett

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 672 Court N.Y. Gen. Term English

Contents

Majority

p. 672
Elizabeth D. Vail, Plaintiff, v. Thomas H. Kensett and others, Defendants. In the Matter of the Application of James C. Eadie, a Referee in Partition, Relator, v. Elizabeth D. Vail, Purchaser, etc., Respondent.

— Judgment upon submitted case as follows: That

p. 673
the children of the sons who held the life estate are necessary parties to the partition action, and that the referee’s title on the case is not good; judgment for purchaser. Opinion by Barnard, P. J.