Hyperlawhypertext legal database Spickerman v. McChesney 52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 594

← Cases

Spickerman v. McChesney

52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 594 Court N.Y. Gen. Term English

Contents

Majority

p. 594
John Spickerman, Respondent, v. Adam McChesney, Appellant.

Orders affirmed on opinion below, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to renewal of application for stay on report of referee in plaintiff’s favor, and before decision in Court of Appeals in former action.