Majority
Headnote
Action to recover damages for personal injuries ■— maintainable against both the contractor and the third party.We tliink tlie Circuit judge ruled correctly on all points, and that no error of law was committed.
The point made by defendant, that the building was being erected by an independent contractor, and that he only should be held responsible, cannot be available upon the facts shown. The plaintiff was not in the service of tlie contractor, but of defendant.
The contractor being short of laborers, “ borrowed from defendant a gang of men,” among whom was the plaintiff.
Under the orders of defendant’s foreman he was put into a dangerous place, where he received his injuries. Upon the facts he could recover against the contractor, and also against the defendant. His action was, therefore, well brought, and the verdict must stand.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Dykman, J., concurred; Cullen, J., concurred in the result.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.