Hyperlawhypertext legal database Williams v. Lindblom 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 303

← Cases

Williams v. Lindblom

94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 303 Court N.Y. Gen. Term English

Judges Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Follett and Parker, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 303
William S. Williams, Appellant, v. Robert Lindblom, Respondent, Impleaded, etc.

Headnote

Case on appeal — stricken from calendar.
Where a case upon appeal has never been settled nor ordered on file by any one who participated in any portion of the proceedings, it must be stricken from the calendar.
Appeal by the plaintiff, William S. Williams, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, Robert Lindblom,
p. 304
entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 12th day of March, 1895, upon the report of a referee, and also from an order, made at the New York Special Term and entered in said clerk’s office on the 11th day of March, 1895, affirming the report of the referee.
John M. Mitchell, for the appellant.
Linus A. Gould, for the respondent.

We find upon an examination of this case that it has never been settled ; nor has it ever been ordered on file by any one who participated in any portion of the proceedings.

The case must be stricken from the calendar.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Follett and Parker, JJ.

Case stricken from calendar.