Hyperlawhypertext legal database Newins v. Rose 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617

← Cases

Newins v. Rose

94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617 Court N.Y. Gen. Term English

Judges All concur.

Decision Majority (1) · Concurring — Cullen, J.:

Contents
p. 617
Joseph H. Newins and Another, Plaintiffs, v. H. Eckford Rose, Defendant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

No opinion.

I vote to affirm without opinion. The testimony of Seaman that he did not sell the goods to defendant was erroneously admitted against defendant’s objection and exceptions and was a mere statement of conclusion. He did not state what the transaction was nor deny defendant’s statement that nothing was said between them reserving the goods plaintiffs had sold Seaman.