Hyperlawhypertext legal database Briel v. City of Buffalo 97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 93

← Cases

Briel v. City of Buffalo

97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 93 Court N.Y. Gen. Term English

Judges Lewis, J., concurred; Ward, J., not sitting.

Delivered by Bradley, J.:

Contents

Majority

p. 93
Lizzie Briel, Respondent, v. The City of Buffalo, Appellant.

Headnote

Municipal corporation — obstruction in a city street — when the city is chcvrgeable with notice thereof.
Where a pile of earth remains in a traveled street of a city for three or four nights continuously, the jury may, upon the trial of an action brought against the city by a person whose carriage has been overturned thereby, find that the city was chargeable with notice of the obstruction in the street, and was negligent in permitting it to remain there until the time of the accident.
Appeal by the defendant, The City of Buffalo, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Erie on the 3d day of May, 1895, upon the verdict of a jury rendered after a trial at the Erie Circuit, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 3d day of May, 1895, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
Frank G. LaugKlvn, for the appellant.
Marcy & Jackson and Wallace Tha/yer, for the respondent.

After daylight had disappeared on the evening of June 16,1890, the carriage in which the plaintiff was riding southerly on Niagara street, in the city of Buffalo, was overturned and she was injured. The accident was caused by a pile of earth which had been deposited in the street by the procurement of the owner of .the adjacent premises for the purpose of having it taken on to his lot, upon which some of the earth drawn there had been conveyed by wheelbarrows.

The recovery on the former trial was not supported because it did not then appear that the earth drawn and deposited at that place in the street, on any day prior to the evening of the injury, remained in the street any night before that in question, and, therefore, no negligence was imputable to the defendant upon the evidence. (Breil v. City of Buffalo, 144 N. Y. 163 .)

Upon the trial now the subject of review', further evidence was given tending to prove that the pile of earth had remained there in the street three or four days and nights continuously up to the time

p. 94
of the accident. The place in question is in a populous portion of tbe city, and Niagara street, on either side of the street railway tracks, is much used for vehicles. And the length of time which the jury were by tbe evidence permitted to find this pile of earth had remained tliere was sncb as to enable them also to find that the defendant was chargeable with notice of the obstruction in the street, and, therefore, with negligence in permitting it to so remain there up to the time of the occurrence in question. (Kunz v. City of Troy, 104 N. Y. 344 .)

The conclusion was also warranted by tbe evidence that the plaintiff was free from the imputation of contributory negligence.

The questions arising upon the conflict in the evidence and all other questions of fact were fairly submitted to the jury, and tlieir verdict is supported by the evidence.

There was no error in the rulings at tbe trial to tbe prejudice of tbe defendant.

The judgment and order should be affirmed.

Lewis, J., concurred; Ward, J., not sitting.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cases cited