Betts v. Bache — 22 N.Y. Super. Ct. 614

Majority

p. 614

Frederick F. Betts, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John H. Bache, Defendant and Appellant.

Headnote

It -was decided in this case, that a complaint for money lost at play, stating that on a day named, defendant received a specified sum of money belonging to or on account of the plaintiff, and which is now due him, claiming judgment therefor, is sufficient on demurrer.

Heard, at Special Term, before Robertson, J., in May, 1862.

Heard in General Term, before Bosworth, Ch. J., Moncrief, Robertson, Barbour and Monell, J. J., May 31, 1862;

decided, June 7, 1862.

p. 615

See the point decided, in the index to this volume, under the title, Pleadings.

See the decisions at Special Term, and on the appeal, reported at length, in 14 Abbotts’ Pr., 279.