Majority
Headnote
An action to recover the value of property lost to the plaintiff hy the negligence of the defendants is not upon a contract, hut upon a breach of duty, as a tort, and is not referable.It has long been a settled question, that actions for torts are not referable, although they may involve the examination of long accounts ; and if such an action is referred, it is a mere arbitration, and the courts will not review the decision of the referees. (Yates v. Russell, 17 John. 461 . Camp v. Root, 18 id. 22. Johnson v. Parmely, 17 id. 129.) The language used in the Code, (as under the Revised Laws and Revised Statutes,) is broad enough to cover all actions, and yet it has uniformly, and scarcely with an exception, been held that references are proper only in actions founded on contract, and never in actions ex delicto. ( Whitaker v. Desfosse, 7 Bosw. 678 .) ;
This action is brought against the defendants to recover the value of property lost to the plaintiff by the negligence and carelessness of the defendants, as ■ common carriers. Such an
The motion to refer must be denied, with $10 costs, to abide the event.
Cases cited
- Whitaker v. Desfosse 7 Bosw. 678 p. 705
- Smith v. Caswell 4 How. Pr. 286 p. 706