Hyperlawhypertext legal database Bloodgood v. Gregory 38 N.Y. Super. Ct. 132

← Cases

Bloodgood v. Gregory

38 N.Y. Super. Ct. 132 6 Jones & S. 132 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1874-10-31 English

Contents

Majority

p. 132
MORRIS S. BLOODGOOD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM GOOD GREGORY, Executor, &c., Defendant and Appellant.
Before Freedman, Van Yorst and Speir, JJ.
Decided October 31, 1874.

Headnote

Appeal from, judgment.
This action was based upon one of the notes mentioned in the foregoing reported case (Cary ®. Gregory), andas the points of law and rulings are the same as in that case, it was stipulated between the parties that the decision of this case should follow that of Cary v. Gregory.
James Flynn, for appellant.
J. E. Cary, attorney in person, for respondent.

For the reasons assigned in Cary v. Gregory, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant, to abide the event. r

Yan Yorst and Speir, JJ., concurred.