Hyperlawhypertext legal database Tuttle v. Rothwell 50 N.Y. Super. Ct. 526

← Cases

Tuttle v. Rothwell

50 N.Y. Super. Ct. 526 18 Jones & S. 526 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1884-02-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 526
James M. Tuttle, appellant, v. Richard P. Rothwell, respondent.
Decided February 4, 1884.

Headnote

Appeal by plaintiff from order striking from the complaint irrelevant and redundant allegations. Motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal.
Edward M. Shepard, for appellant;
Abram Kling, for respondent.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and O’ Gorman, J.

Order appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs, and disbursements to be faxed. The court does not pass upon the merits of the motion to dismiss, but having affirmed the order, denies the motion, formally, without costs.