Hyperlawhypertext legal database Amerman v. Deane 58 N.Y. Super. Ct. 582

← Cases

Amerman v. Deane

58 N.Y. Super. Ct. 582 26 Jones & S. 582 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1890-04-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 582
Mary V. Amerman, Respondent v. Bertha Deane, Appellant.
Decided April 21, 1890.

Headnote

Motion for a re-argument.
W. J. Townsend, for respondent. John H. Deane, for appellant.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J. The decision in respect of which the motion was made will be found in 57 N. Y. Superior Court Rep. 175. The motion was denied, the following opinion being delivered.

The opinion written in the case did not by any expression recognize the fact that equity is said to give fuller compensation than is gained by an action at law. That did not affect the substance of the decision which intended to affirm that neither equity or law would give as damages what in reality was not damages. Motion denied with ten dollars costs.