Hyperlawhypertext legal database Altmayer v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co. 59 N.Y. Super. Ct. 568

← Cases

Altmayer v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

59 N.Y. Super. Ct. 568 27 Jones & S. 568 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1891-05-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 568
AARON ALTMAYER, Respondent v. THE METROPOLITAN ELEVATED RAILWAY COMPANY, et al., Appellants. MARIE T. HAUSER, Respondent v. Same Defendants, Appellants. JOHN BECKER, Respondent v. Same Defendants, Appellants. CHARLES F. HELMS, Respondent v. Same Defendants, Appellants.

Headnote

Appeals— Omission in decision of requests found. In the absence of a motion for the correction of the omission and an order thereon, the omission ■ appears to be without objection and a consent is thereby evinced that the cases proceed and appeals be heard on the decision as made.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and McAdam, J.
Decided May 4, 1891.
p. 569
Appeals from judgments entered on findings and conclusions made by a judge on a trial before the court without a jury.
Davies & Rapallo, attorneys, and Julien T. Davies and J. C. Thomson of counsel, for appellants.
Sackett & Bennett, attorneys, and Charles Gibson Bennett of counsel, for respondents.

The Court (per Curiam) held as stated in the headnote and affirmed the judgments, with costs.