Hyperlawhypertext legal database Storck v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co. 59 N.Y. Super. Ct. 588

← Cases

Storck v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

59 N.Y. Super. Ct. 588 27 Jones & S. 588 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1891-05-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 588
Frederick Storck, Respondent v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
Decided May 4, 1891.

Headnote

Appeal by defendants from judgment entered upon findings and conclusions at special term.
Julien T. Davies and Brainard Tolles, for appellants.
Sackett & Bennett, attorneys, and Charles Gibson Bennett of counsel, for respondent.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Dugro, J.

The question involved was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to require the" trial judge to find certain requests. The Court (per Curiam) held it insufficient and affirmed the judgment, with costs..