Hyperlawhypertext legal database Shambow v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad 59 N.Y. Super. Ct. 590

← Cases

Shambow v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

59 N.Y. Super. Ct. 590 27 Jones & S. 590 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1891-07-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 590
George T. Shambow, Respondent v. The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant.
Decided July 2, 1891.

Headnote

Appeal from judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the' verdict' of a jury, and from order denying defendant’s motion Upon the judge’s minutes for a new trial.
Page & Taft, for appellant.
Thomas P. Wickes, for respondent.
Before Freedman, Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ,

The questions involved were as to defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence. The Court (Freedman, J., writing, Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ., concurring) held, that under the evidence those questions were properly submitted to thé jury, and that the evidence supported the verdict and affirmed the judgment and order, with costs.