Hyperlawhypertext legal database Uhlenhaut v. Manhattan Railway Co. 60 N.Y. Super. Ct. 501

← Cases

Uhlenhaut v. Manhattan Railway Co.

60 N.Y. Super. Ct. 501 28 Jones & S. 501 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1892-04-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 501
John H. F. Uhlenhaut, Respondent v. The Manhattan Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
Decided April 11,1892.

Headnote

Appeal by defendants from judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon decision of
p. 502
judge at special term.
Davies & Rapallo, for appellants. Charles E. Crowell, attorney, and Roger Foster of counsel, for respondent.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ.

The trial judge directed each of defendants’ proposed findings to be marked “ refused except so far as covered by the findings of fact and conclusions of law settled and signed by me.” The general term held that this was not prejudicial error requiring reversal. Opinion by Dugro, J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J. and Gildersleeve, J., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs.