← Cases

Whiting v. Semler

3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 22 Court N.Y. Ch. Decision date 1843-04-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 22
Franklin Whiting v. John Semler et al.
H. H. Burlock, for complainant; Harris Wilson, for defendants.

Decree appealed from reversed with costs, and a decree directed to be entered declaring the bill of sale and the deeds from Semler to Newman fraudulent and void as against the complainant; and decreeing payment of the complainant’s debt, with interest and costs, out of the surplus proceeds of the premises, which have been paid into court; with liberty to complainant to apply for further directions, if necessary.