Hyperlawhypertext legal database Smith v. Smith 3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 88

← Cases

Smith v. Smith

3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 88 Court N.Y. Ch. Decision date 1843-11-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 88
Parmenus Smith v. Samuel L. Smith.
W. Silliman, for complainant; J. Dikeman, for defendant.

Decree of the late assistant vice chancellor affirmed so far as relates to the question of costs, and the residue thereof reversed, without costs to either party. And a decree directed to be entered for the appointment of commissioners to make partition of the property in dispute.