Majority
p. 88Edwin Adams v. Christopher Joslyn, 2d et al.
S. Beardsley, for complainant; D. Burwell, for defendants.
So much of the decree of the vice chancellor as is appealed from by defendant Joslin affirmed with costs, and so much thereof as relates to the costs of Judd, modified by giving him only the ootts he would have boon en til Jed to upon the allowance >f demurrer Io the hill.