Remer v. Peck — 3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 89

Majority

p. 89

George I. Remer et al., Ex’rs, &c. appellants v. Lewis R. Peck, respondent.

Accounting by . surrogate.

D. B. Prosser, for appellants; H. Welles for respondent.

Decided that a surrogate has jurisdiction to decree an account against executors, upon the application of

p. 90

ñ person claiming to bo á creditor of the decedent, although the existence of the debt is denied by the executors.

Decree appealed from affirmed with costs, and proceedings remitted to the surrogate.