← Cases

Lakens v. Fielden

5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 10 Court N.Y. Ch. Decision date 1845-05-26 English

Contents

Majority

p. 10
Pierre Francois Lakens et al. v. Joshua Fielden et al.
J. Rhoades, for appellant;
W. W. Van.Wagenen, for respondents.

Headnote

fcracomrniisfon rteSwrer'can-’ sot bo received.

Decided in this ease, that under an order for a common dedimus, to take the answer of the defendant, it is jrregUiar for the commissioners to return a demurrer instead of an answer. But that the defendant may move the court for a commission to take his plea, aftswer or demurrer, and .file ‘ court will grant it, with the restriction not to demur alone; and then the commissioners may receive a plea, or an answer and demurrer, because they have special authority to do so.

Order appealed from reversed, and motion denied. Costs to abide the event of the suit.