~APPELLANT;'Jm2 J. (dissenting) :-For the reasons given in Kalmen Mapa and Isadore Goldist v. The Municipal Corporation of the Township of North York and S. G. Beckett, Building Commissioner', I would dismiss this appeal with costs.
Appeal allowed with costs, and JJ. dissenting.
Solicitors for the appellants: Fasken, Calvin, MacKenzie, Williston & Swackhamer, Toronto.
Solicitors for the respondents: Arnup, Foulds, Weir, Boeckh, Morris & Robinson, Toronto.
TASHAN LIMITED (Applicant) .......... THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF
THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH YORK
THERESPONDENTS.
and S.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, allowing an appeal from a judgment of Brooke J. wherein it was declared that the plans as submitted by the applicant for a proposed apartment hotel had been approved within the meaning of s. 30(7) (b) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1960, s. 296. Appeal allowed, Martland and Hall JJ. dissenting.
W. B. Williston, Q.C., R. J. Rolls and D. S. Affleck, for the appellant.
J. T. Weir, Q.C., and M. McQuaid, for the respondents.
J.:-For the reasons given in Kalmen Mapa and Isadore Goldist v. The Municipal Corporation of the Township of North York and S. G. Beckett, Building Commissioner', I would allow this appeal with costs and make the same order.
J. (dissenting):-For the reasons given in Kalmen Mapa and Isadore Goldist v. The Municipal Corporation of the Township of North York and S. G. Beckett, Building Commissioner', I would dismiss this appeal with costs.
Appeal allowed with costs, and JJ. dissenting.
Statutes and regulations cited
-
Unresolved citations
- s. 30(7)
- s. 296