The action was dismised in the two courts below, and I am of opinion that these judgments cannot be impugned.
No ground has been shown which would justify the maintaining of the plaintiffs' action. The z arbitrators were the sovereign judges of the amount the plaintiffs were entitled to, and there is no foundation for the allegation that they ever took into consi- Tase deration matters which they were not entitled to consider.
They seem to have considered the whole matter with utmost fairness, taking the value of the property before the railway passed, then its value after the railway passed, and deducting the one from the other awarded the difference to the plaintiffs. I would dismiss the appeal.
Solicitors for appellants : Taylor 4' Buchan.
Solicitors for respondents : Abbotts, Campbell &r Meredith.
[VOL. XX.