of Canada (1) in favour of the suppliants.
Certain Crown lands in Quebec had been granted to the suppliants, as assignees of one Kaye, the applicant for said lands, from which the Crown contended the coal thereon was reserved, which was the sole question in issue. The learned judge of the Exchequer Court held that there being no express or implied agreement to the contrary the suppliants were entitled to a grant conveying such mines and minerals as would pass without express words.
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Exchequer Court.
Hogg Q.C. for the appellant.
Gormully Q.C. and Campbell for the respondents.
WIGLE v. WILLIAMS.
APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, affirming the judgment for the plaintiff Williams at the trial.