Hyperlawhypertext legal database Atkinson v. Rochester Printing Co. 2 Silv. Ct. App. 149

← Cases

Atkinson v. Rochester Printing Co.

2 Silv. Ct. App. 149 Court Court of Appeals, Decision date 1889-03-12 English

Contents

Majority

p. 149
Hobart S. Atkinson, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. The Rochester Printing Company, Appellant.
Court of Appeals,
March 12, 1889.

Headnote

Court of appeals. Removal of cause.—It is not a sufficient reason for moving a case from the second division of the court of appeals into the first division of the court, that one or even two of the judges of the former court are disqualified from sitting upon the argument of the case there.
Motion to transfer case from the calendar of the court of appeals, second division, to the calendar of the court of appeals.
J. & Q. Van Voorhis, for appellant.
Smith & Briggs, for respondent.

It is not a sufficient reason for moving a case from the court of appeals, second division, into this

p. 150
court, that one or ev.en two of the judges of that court are disqualified from sitting upon the argument of the case there.

This motion, should, therefore, be denied.

All concur.'