Majority — Waite C.J.
Syllabus
1. A town in Wisconsin, being thereunto authorized by law, subscribed for stock in a railroad company, and issued its bonds in payment therefor, each reciting that "it “ shall be valid only when it 'is thereon duly certified, that the conditions upon which it was voted, issued, and deposited by said town have been perfo.rméd.”- Suit was brought on the bonds by a party who in good faith purchased them before they matured. Held, that the certificate on the bonds (infra, p. 87) is in proper form, estopping the town from denying their validity, and placing them in a condition to be put on .the market as commercial paper.delivered the opinion of the court.
The first question certified in this' case is answered in the affirmative.
We think that the certificate on the back of thé bonds .is a substantial compliance with the condition on their face, and the proposition of the railroad company accepted by the town. The condition as expressed in the bonds is in the exact- language of the second article of the proposition,'and implies that they shall he considered as fully, executed, and that they may be put on the market as valid commercial paper, ■“ when it is thereon duly certified that the conditions upon which they were voted, issued, and deposited by said town have been performed.” To ascertain what “ duly means in this connection it is necessary to look to the other parts of the proposition, and there we find in article 3 that the bonds, when issued by the proper officers of the town,-were to be deposited with the National Bank.of Commerce in New York, “in trust for said town, until1 such time as'there shall be filed in said bank a properly authenticated certificate,- signed by, the chief officer of this
The fact that the certificate- furnished the bank -is signed in the name of the railroad company by the president is not a valid objection. It was signed by the president, 'and that is all the proposition required.
The third and fourth questions are also answered in the.affirmative,
• These answers dispose of the case, and make it unnecessary to consider the second' question certified. When the bonds were ■“ duly certified ” and delivered to the railroad company by the bank, they became, under the agreement of the parties, valid instruments,' completely executed in form, and in a condition to be put on the market as' commercial paper. Having on them the necessary, certificate, the purchaser need not inquire whether the fa.cts were as certified. Anthony v. County of Jasper, 101 U. S. 693 . With the certificate indorsed, the bonds were in legal effect the same as if they had been issued by the proper officers under full authority without the condition which appeared on their face. Under these circumstances, the condition .did not destroy their negotiability.
Judgment affirmed.
Cases cited
- County of Scotland v. Thomas 94 U. S. 682 p. 95
- Anthony v. County of Jasper 101 U. S. 693 p. 95