Pensacola Ice Co. v. Perry — 120 U.S. 318

Majority — Waite C.J.

p. 318

PENSACOLA ICE COMPANY v. PERRY.

Syllabus

error to the circuit court of the united states FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF'FLORIDA.

Submitted December 20, 1886.

—Decided February 7, 1887.

It appearing by the record in this court that the Verdict at the trial of an action of ejectment in the Circuit Court of the United States sitting in Florida did not state the quantity of the estate or describe the land, the judgment was reversed and the canse remanded for a new trial.

The case is stated in the opinion of the court,

Mr. William A. Blount for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Wayne Me Veagh for defendant in error.

delivered the opinion of the court.

p. 319

A statute of Florida, approved February 22, 1881, contains tlie following provisions:

“ Sec. A The verdict in actions of ejectment shall, when for the plaintiff, state the quantity of the estate of the plaintiff, and describe the land by its metes and bounds, by the number of the lot or other certain description.

“ Sec. 5. The judgment awarding possession shall, in like manner, state the quantity of the estate, and give description of the land recovered.”

This was an action of ejectment, and the verdict, which was fo.r the plaintiff, -did not state the quantity of the estate or describe the land. This is assigned for error, among others, and Perry, the defendant in error, in the brief which has been filed in his behalf, confesses that the judgment in hisffavor is thereby vitiated. Without considering any of the other errors, assigned, therefore, we reverse the judgment on this ground alone and remand the cause for a new trial. '

Reversed.