Majority — Blatchford J.
Syllabus
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS.delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal by the claimant from a judgment of the Court of Claims, dismissing his petition, on the following facts found by that court: An election was held on the 4th of November, 1884, in the Second Congressional District of Rhode Island, for the purpose of electing by the people a
Page, by his petition to the Court of Claims, claimed that he was entitled to the full pay of $5000 a year for the two years from March 3, 1885, to March 3, 1887, and that, therefore, he was entitled to the further payment of $9468.18. The contention of Page is that, on the facts found, Pirce, not having been elected a member of the 49th Congress, was never such member; that, therefore, he was not the predecessor of Page, within the meaning of § 51 of the Bevised'Statutes ; and that the member of the House of Bepresentatives
Section 51 of the Bevised Statutes provides as follows: “ Whenever a vacancy occurs in either House of Congress, by death or otherwise, of any member or delegate elected or appointed thereto, after the commencement of the Congress to which he has been elected or appointed, the person elected or appointed to fill it shall be compensated and paid from the time that the compensation of his predecessor ceased.” The argument made is that, under this section, no person could have been the predecessor of Page,'unless he was a member elected for the 49th Congress; and that Pirce was declared by the House of Bepresentatives not to have been elected such member. But, although Pirce may not have been so elected, it does not follow that he was not the predecessor of Page, within the meaning of § 51, or that the Bepresentative in the 48th Congress was such predecessor.
The proper construction of § 51 is that the predecessor of the person elected to fill a vacancy must be á person who was the predecessor in the same Congress. If no such person is to be found, because no such person was duly elected, Page had no predecessor in the sense of § 51, and that section does not apply to his case. But we think that, under the proper construction of § 51, Pirce was the predecessor of Page, as to compensation or salary. Hiá credentials- showed that he was regularly elected; he must have been placed on the roll of Bepresentatives-eléct, under § 31 of the Bevised Statutes; he was sworn in, took his seat, voted, served on committees, and drew the salary and the mileage. Under §§ 38 and 39, he was entitled to his salary, because his credentials, in due form of law, had been duly filed with the clerk, under § 31, and because he'took the required oath. Section 51 refers only to. a vacancy occurring after the commencement of a particular Congress, and in the membership of that Congress; and the reference to a “ predecessor ” is plainly' intended to apply only to a predecessor in that Congress. If there was any such predecessor of Page it was Pirce. If there was no predecessor of Page in that Congress, § 51 does not apply to that case.
The judgment of the Court óf Claims is affirmed.