Majority — Puller C.J.
Syllabus
Error to the circuit court of the united states for the DISTRICT OF COLORADO.delivered the opinion of the court.
This case was tried by the Circuit Court, without a jury, and under §§ 649 and 700, Rev. Stat., the finding must be “ either general or special.” It cannot be both. Here there was a general finding.
The record contains a bill of exceptions, but no exceptions to the rulings of the court in the progress of the trial of the cause were thereby duly presented, and although after reciting the evidence it is therein stated that “ the court thereafter and during the said term made the following findings of fact and judgment thereon,” which is followed by an opinion of the court assigning reasons for its conclusions, this cannot be treated as a special finding enabling us to determine whether the facts found support the judgment, nor can the general finding be disregarded. Dickinson v. Planters’ Bank, 16 Wall. 250 ; Ins. Co. v. Folsom, 18 Wall. 237 ; Norris v. Jackson, 9
The record raises no questions open to revision by us and the judgment is Affirmed.
Cases cited
- Dickinson v. Planters' Bank 16 Wall. 250 p. 222
- Insurance Co. v. Folsom 18 Wall. 237 p. 222
- Flanders v. Tweed 9 Wall. 425 p. 223
- Insurance Co. v. Tweed 7 Wall. 44 p. 223
- Miller v. Life Insurance 12 Wall. 285 p. 223
- Insurance Co. v. Sea 21 Wall. 158 p. 223
- Martinton v. Fairbanks 112 U. S. 670 p. 223
- Raimond v. Terrebonne Parish 132 U. S. 192 p. 223
- Glenn v. Fant 134 U. S. 398 p. 223
- Lloyd v. McWilliams 137 U. S. 576 p. 223