Hyperlawhypertext legal database Davies v. Slidell 154 U.S. 625

← Cases

Davies v. Slidell

154 U.S. 625 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1876-11-27 Docket Nos. 417, 435, 668 and 669 English

Delivered by Waite C.J.

Contents

Majority — Waite C.J.

p. 625
DAVIES v. SLIDELL. HUPPENBAUR v. SLIDELL. AMES v. SLIDELL’S HEIRS. SAME v. SAME.

Syllabus

ERROR. TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
Nos. 417, 435, 668 and 669.
Submitted November 20, 1876.
Decided November 27, 1876.
Affirmed upon the authority of Bigelow v. Forrest, 9 Wall. 339 ; Day v. Micou, 18 Wall. 156 ; and Wallach v. Van Biswick, 92 U. S. 202 .

delivered the opinion of the court.

We are not inclined to hear a re-argument of the Federal ques

p. 626
fcions presented by the records in these cases. They were decided in Bigelow v. Forrest, 9 Wall. 339 ; Day v. Micou, 18 Wall. 156 ; and Wallach v. Van Riswick, 92 U. U. 202. The court below lias followed these decisions, with which we are entirely satisfied.

Mr. L. Madison Day, Mr. D. C. Labalt, Mr. T. J. Durant and Mr., Charles W. Hornor for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Thomas Allen Clarke for defendants in error.

W$, therefore, affirm the judgment in each of the several cases, under the practice authorized by the amendment to Rule 6, section . 3, promulgated at the last term. Affirmed

Cases cited