Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Hyde v. Continental Trust Co. 157 U.S. 654

← Cases

Hyde v. Continental Trust Co.

157 U.S. 654 Court SCOTUS Docket No. 894 English

Judges The opinion of Mr. Justice Field was entitled in this case as well as in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company.; Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Hablan dissented from the decree in this case for the reasons given in their dissenting opinions in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company.

Delivered by Field J.

Contents

Majority — Field J.

p. 654
Hyde v. Continental Trust Company.
No. 894.

Syllabus

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

This ease differs in no essential respect from that just decided, and must be disposed of in the same way.

Decree accordingly.

The opinion of Mr. Justice Field was entitled in this case as well as in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company.

Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Hablan dissented from the decree in this case for the reasons given in their dissenting opinions in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company.