Majority — Hablan J.
p. 203Lumberman’s Bank v. Huston. No. 203. Argued and submitted April 21, 1897. Decided May 10, 1897
Syllabus
Error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.delivered the opinion of the court.
The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff' in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined
p. 204
in Twin City National Bank v. Nebeker, just decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment is
Mr. John J. Crawford for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Solicitor General for defendant in error.
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice White concurred in the result.