Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Siegel v. New York & Harlem Railroad 200 U.S. 615

← Cases

Siegel v. New York & Harlem Railroad

200 U.S. 615 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1906-01-19 Docket No. 407; No. 453; No. 454; No. 493 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 615
No. 407.
No. 453.
No. 454.
No. 493.
Anna Siegel, Plaintiff in Error, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al.; Hedewig Kriete, Plaintiff in Error, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al.; David W. O’Neil et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al; and Franziska Schalz, Plaintiff in Error, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al.
Argued January 15 and 16, 1906.
Decided January 19, 1906.
Mr. L. M. Berkeley and Mr. Charles A. Hess for. •plaintiffs in error. Mr. Edward Winslow Paige and Mr. Ira A. Place for defendants in error. '

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Judgments reversed with costs, and cases remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions of this court in Muhlker v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company, 197 U. S. 544 ; Birrell v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company, 198 U. S. 390 ; Kierns v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company, 198 U. S. 390 .

Cases cited