Majority
p. 580No. 358. The Blythe Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Bankers’ Investment Company et al. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 21, 1907. Decided October 28, 1907.
Syllabus
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.Mr. George W. Towle for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. E. S. Heller and Mr. Thomas 7. Bergin for defendants in error.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Blythe v. Hinckley, 84 Fed. Rep. 228 ; Blythe Company v. Blythe, 172 U. S. 644 ; Blythe Company v. Hinckley, 111 Fed. Rep. 827 ; Blythe Company v. Hinckley, 184 U. S. 701 ; Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. S. 333 ; Dupaneur v. Rochereau, 21 Wall. 130 ; Metcalf v. Watertown, 153 U. S. 671 ; Blythe Company v. Bankers’ Investment Company, 147 California, 82; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Fitzgerald, 160 U. S. 558 , 582; Temple v. Hagar, 4 Wall. 432 , 434.
Cases cited
- 172 U. S. 644 172 U. S. 644 p. 580
- 184 U. S. 701 184 U. S. 701 p. 580
- Blythe v. Hinckley 180 U. S. 333 p. 580
- Dupasseur v. Rochereau 21 Wall. 130 p. 580
- Metcalf v. Watertown 153 U. S. 671 p. 580
- 160 U. S. 558 160 U. S. 558 p. 580
- 4 Wall. 432 4 Wall. 432 p. 580