Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United States 209 U.S. 90

← Cases

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United States

209 U.S. 90 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1908-03-16 Docket No. 552 English

Judges Mr. Justice Moody took-no part in the disposition of this case.

Decision Majority (1) — Day J. · Dissent — Brewer’s J.

Contents
p. 90
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. UNITED STATES.

Syllabus

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 552.
Submitted January 22, 1908.
Decided March 16, 1908.
Decided on the authority of Armour Packing Company y. United States, ante, p. 56.
The facts are stated in the opinion.’
Mr. Frank Hagerman, Mr. J. C.. Cowin, Mr. A. R. Urion, Mr. Henry Feeder and Mr. M. W. Borders for petitioners.
The Attorney General, Mr. Milton D. Purdy, Assistant to the Attorney General, and Mr. A. S. Van Valkenburgh, United States Attorney, for the United States.

delivered the opinion of the court.

The counsel for the petitioner and the Solicitor General for the United States having filed a stipulation in writing in this cause, agreeing to abide the result of the Packing Company cases just decided (Nos. 467, 468, 469 and 470), it is hereby ordered that the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals in this case be

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Moody took-no part in the disposition of this case.

dissent in Armour Packing Co. v. United States, ante, p. 56, applied also to this case.