Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser 212 U.S. 560

← Cases

Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser

212 U.S. 560 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1908-12-07 Docket Nos. 141, 142, 178 English

Delivered by *561 Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 560
PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. LIGHTHEISER. SAME v. COLLINS. SAME v. ROSS.

Syllabus

WRITS OF ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
Nos. 141, 142, 178.
Motions to dismiss or affirm, and for damages.
Submitted November 30, 1908.
Decided December 7, 1908.
Writs of error to review judgments of Supremo Court of State of Indiana, 168 Indiana, 438, 467, and 80 N. E. Rep. 845 , in suits involving the constitutionality of the Employers’ Liability Act of that State dismissed for want of jurisdiction without opinion. Tullís v. Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348 , followed.
Mr. Stewart T. McConnell, Mr. Albert G. Jenkines, Mr. Bertram C. Jenkines and Mr. Charles H. Stuart for defendants in error in support of the motions.
Mr. Allen Zollars and Mr. George E. Ross for plaintiff in error in opposition to the motions.

Writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348 , and cases cited; Pittsburg &c. Ry. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Indiana, 438; Same v. Collins, 168 Indiana, 467; and Same v. Ross, 80 N.

Cases cited