Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Minnesota ex rel. City of Minneapolis 214 U.S. 497

← Cases

St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Minnesota ex rel. City of Minneapolis

214 U.S. 497 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1909-04-26 Docket No. 162 English

Delivered by Per Curiam:

Contents

Majority

p. 497
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA ex rel. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.

Syllabus

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ¿THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
No. 162.
Argued April 19, 20, 1909.
Decided April 26, 1909.
Affirmed on authority of Northern Pacific Railway v. Duluth, 208 U. S. 583 .[1]
This case involved a question almost the same as that in
p. 498
Northern Pacific Railway v. Duluth in which it was held that a railway was not deprived of its property without due process of law by being obliged to rebuild a viaduct over streets of a city.
Mr. Rome G. Brown, with whom Mr. Charles S. Albert and Mr. William R. Begg were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Frank Healy, with whom Mr. Albert E. Clarke was on the brief, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of Northern Pacific Railway Company v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Duluth, 208 U. S. 583 .

Cases cited