Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Dyer v. City of Melrose 215 U.S. 594

← Cases

Dyer v. City of Melrose

215 U.S. 594 Court SCOTUS Decision date 1910-01-24 Docket No. 93 English

Delivered by Per Curiam.

Contents

Majority

p. 594
DYER v. CITY OF MELROSE.

Syllabus

ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE STATE OE MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 93.
Argued January 20, 1910.
Decided January 24, 1910.
A judgment of the state court sustaining a tax on property of an officer of the United States Navy affirmed on the authority of previous cases.[1]
197 Massachusetts, 99, affirmed.
Mr. Chester M. Pratt for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Claude L. Allen for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed with, costs. Hibernia Savings Society v. San Francisco, 200 U. S. 310 ; McIntosh v. Aubrey, 185 U. S. 122 ; Railroad Co. v. Peniston, 18 Wall. 5 ; case below, Dyer v. Melrose, 197 Massachusetts, 99.

Cases cited